In 2025, cybersecurity is no longer a support function. It is central to business continuity, customer trust, and digital growth. Yet many Indian enterprises continue to make avoidable security mistakes. These lapses are not just technical oversights but structural weaknesses that leave organizations exposed to modern-day threats.
Drawing on insights from Seqrite’s latest nationwide and regional threat reports, Kaspersky’s ransomware findings, CrowdStrike’s global outage case, Fortinet’s AI threat data, and Aujas’s regional advisory experience, these ten missteps highlight structural gaps Indian enterprises must address.
1. Treating Cybersecurity as a Cost Center
Many organizations still approach security as a compliance exercise or a discretionary budget item. As a result, they underinvest in critical areas such as threat detection, incident response, and zero trust architecture. This mindset limits agility and increases long-term risk exposure. According to the IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024, the average cost of a data breach in India reached an all-time high of INR 195 million. This figure, up 9% from the previous year, underscores that inaction is far more expensive than prevention.Cybersecurity should be treated as a strategic enabler, embedded across departments and business units.
- Failing to Detect Advanced Threat Behavior
Static defenses cannot stop dynamic threats. Seqrite’s India Cyber Threat Report 2025 found over 369 million malware detections in a single year, with behavior-based attacks rising to 14.56 percent. Without endpoint security that monitors patterns, isolates infected devices, and auto-responds in real time, enterprises miss high-risk activity hiding in plain sight. Platforms like Seqrite Endpoint Security use behavior analytics and AI to identify unknown threats before they spread. Without endpoint security solutions that leverage behavior analytics and AI, enterprises miss subtle indicators of compromise such as unusual application activity or lateral movement. Detection gaps allow threats to reside undetected for longer periods, increasing the damage potential. - Ignoring Patch and Vulnerability Management
Unpatched systems remain one of the most common entry points for attackers. Enterprises often delay patching due to operational dependencies or manual workflows, leaving critical applications exposed to known vulnerabilities. Automating the patch management process helps close these gaps quickly and consistently, reducing the window of risk and improving overall security hygiene. - Weak Employee Awareness and Training
Human error continues to be a leading cause of breaches—responsible for nearly 74% of data compromises globally, according to the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report 2025. From clicking on sophisticated phishing links to misconfiguring cloud permissions, employees often inadvertently open doors that attackers exploit. Yet, in many Indian enterprises, security awareness is still treated as a one-time training or policy acknowledgment.Cybersecurity culture should be built over time, with continuous education, simulated attacks, and clear reporting channels. - Underestimating Identity and Access Risk
With remote work, cloud adoption, and AI automation accelerating, the number of digital identities in an organization has surged, often far beyond the number of human users. Aujas Cybersecurity reports that robust oversight across both human and machine identities is typically lacking in India, elevating insider risk Machine identities, such as service accounts, APIs, bots, and AI agents, now outnumber employees in many large enterprises. However, while human identity governance has matured, machine identity management remains inconsistent or neglected. Without robust controls, visibility, and conditional access policies across both human and non-human identities, organizations risk overprovisioned access, privilege creep, and internal threat exposure. - Inadequate Incident Response Preparedness
Most organizations have some form of response protocol, but few test them regularly. Without dry runs and clearly defined roles, even a small breach can lead to confusion, delays, and reputational damage. The average cost associated with breach disruption, including downtime and notification expenses - rose by 45% in India in 2024 according to IBM, with notification costs up 19% A well-prepared response plan requires centralized visibility across systems, early detection, and the ability to coordinate actions quickly. Regular simulations and streamlined workflows can make the difference between containment and crisis. - Ignoring Third-Party and Supply Chain Exposure
Vendors, contractors, and digital supply chain partners often introduce hidden vulnerabilities—many of which go undetected until exploited. Despite growing interconnectivity, only 23% of organizations globally monitor third-party vendors in real-time, according to Gartner. In India, regulators like the RBI and BSE have issued fresh advisories urging financial institutions to strengthen third-party risk oversight, especially amid rising geopolitical cyber threats. Attackers increasingly infiltrate large enterprises by first compromising smaller, less-protected vendors, a trend observed in recent healthcare and BFSI breaches. - Using Fragmented Security Tools
Many enterprises still operate with a disconnected mix of tools for endpoints, identity, cloud, and network security. This fragmentation creates gaps, slows incident response, and burdens already stretched security teams. The shift toward unified platforms enables better visibility, faster action, and streamlined policy enforcement. Some advanced setups also incorporate AI-driven assistants and centralized device intelligence, helping teams move from reactive firefighting to coordinated defense. - Not Adapting to Sector-Specific Threats
Threat patterns are no longer uniform, they vary significantly across industries. In India, sectors like healthcare, BFSI, and education have emerged as top targets due to their sensitive data, legacy infrastructure, and operational complexity. CERT-In bulletins and Seqrite’s 2025 report document the rise of industry-specific malware and phishing campaigns aimed at these vulnerable sectors - Lacking Real-Time Threat Intelligence
Security teams need timely, actionable insights to stay ahead of fast-evolving threats. Fortinet’s 2025 Threat Landscape Report shows a 500% increase in AI-driven cyberattacks year-over-year, and ransomware is now involved in 44% of breaches, with new variants emerging rapidly Without access to reliable intelligence on malware trends, attacker tactics, and breach indicators, decision-making becomes reactive and risk increases. Integrating real-time threat intelligence into security operations enables faster detection, sharper prioritization, and more informed responses when it matters most.
Final Thought
Indian enterprises are making real progress in cybersecurity, but these ten missteps continue to hold many back. A resilient security posture requires more than just tools. It demands aligned strategy, continuous learning, and a proactive mindset. As threats evolve, so must the response—faster, smarter, and more integrated across every layer of the business. The organizations that succeed will be those that treat cybersecurity not as a checkpoint, but as a core capability for growth, trust, and long-term resilience..
Reviewed by admin
on
August 06, 2025
Rating:
.png)
.png)
.png)
